You may be familiar with the series of “How do you mark your Titleist?” ads (see example below). Titleist just announced a promotion where no Sharpie is required.
Timed for Mother’s Day and Father’s Day, Titleist is waiving personalization charges on its popular Pro V1 and Pro V1x golf balls, as well as the new NXT Tour, NXT and DT SoLo models.
On any order of just one dozen or more, customers can create their unique personalized message imprinted on the golf ball in up to three lines of block text in black, blue, green or red ink for no additional charge.
To learn more, visit your local golf shop or any authorized Titleist golf ball retailer. The promo ends June 30, 2010.
According to AP, Lorena Ochoa, the No. 1 player in women’s golf the last three years, has just announced her retirement. A post on her website said the following:
“Lorena Ochoa confirms her retirement from the LPGA, as news reports in some media have said today,” her statement said. “The reasons and more details on the matter will be given by Lorena personally in a press conference on Friday in Mexico City. Lorena will share this news of a new stage in her life with her sponsors, family members and friends.”
Ochoa married Andres Conesa, the chief executive of Aeromexico airline, in December.
On the LPGA website, there is a clip of Ochoa talking about what she would do if she wasn’t a professional golfer… Rumor is she wants to start a family, but the video does provide some insight into other activities she may want to pursue:
I really don’t want to go on and on about this, but I couldn’t help notice it, and wanted to know if anyone else out there noticed the same. The other day, I was watching the first episode of ‘Donald J. Trump’s Fabulous World of Golf’ (I’ll reserve my commentary on this show for a later post, because what I’m concerned about here is the actual match that took place). What I noticed near the end of the first match was, well, it was troubling.
The match in question was between Football Hall of Fame Members Jerry Rice and Lawrence Taylor. Jerry has a half-decent swing, Lawrence, well, not so much. What’s amazing about Lawrence is how well he manages to get the ball in the hole, with a swing that looks like a full-body dry heave… ANYWAYS…
Lawrence went on to win the match 1 up (I believe that was the final score?)… But on the 17th hole, Lawrence hit his tee ball into the edge of a water hazard. His ball was playable, but it was within the hazard, which was clearly marked. While addressing his ball, I could have sworn he grounded his club within the hazard. Did anyone else not see that!? Or am I seeing things!? This could have clearly been the turning point in the match for Jerry.
Again, please correct me if I’m wrong, but I could swear this is what I noticed. I’m all about playing by the rules, and was a little shocked by this especially when the whole darn thing was televised for everyone to see.
Sound off in the comments, would ya?
Note: Then again, I wouldn’t be surprised if Lawrence didn’t know the rule (not saying that’s an excuse, he should know the rules). From some of his actions on the course he DID seem a little off… I mean, the guy walked over his own putting line at one point, on a short must-make 5 footer. What gives LT? I thought you played every day!?
Picture this. You’re in a sudden-death playoff. You hit your approach shot into some hard-packed sand and reeds down the left side of the hole. A troubling situation for sure, but after closer inspection, you’re convinced you can pop the ball out and on to the green for a chance at par. You go for it, and are successful at extracting the ball to the green. But wait, you think you noticed a loose impediment move on your backswing. Did you hit it? Do you call a penalty on yourself?
Brian Davis waits for the ruling from on-course referee Slugger White
That’s the situation that faced the 35 year-old Brian Davis at the Verizon Heritage last night at Harbor Town. The Englishman was locked in a sudden-death playoff with Jim Furyk, when he slightly hooked his second shot into the garbage short left of the 18th green.
Brian thought he noticed his club strike a loose impediment, and IMMEDIATELY called a rules official over once the ball came to rest. After some discussion between rules officials and Brian, it was determined that if he did strike the impediment on his backswing, that a 2 shot penalty would have to be assessed. Brian took the penalty, and Furyk won the playoff.
True, Furyk probably would have won the playoff anyway (he lagged his birdie attempt to about 2 feet for par), but that’s not the point here. The point is that Brian played by the rules, he played with heart, and put any title or monetary reward down the list in terms of his priorities. To win, he wanted to do so by the rules.
Golf is a game of character, honor and integrity. Following Brian Davis’ actions on the 18th at Harbor Town yesterday evening, I think we can all agree Brian is overflowing with those traits, and more.
After Furyk drained his par putt and Davis had a chance to reflect, he had this to say:
“I want to win a PGA Tour event more than just about anything but I play by the rules and no victory would be worthwhile if it had a cloud hanging over it. I saw the grass move, called Slugger (White, the referee) over and that’s it, end of story.”
Well done, Brian. Although you didn’t win the event, you won a lot of respect and admiration from tour players, fans, and golfers worldwide.
Harbour Town, a part of the Sea Pines Resort on Hilton Head Island in South Carolina, is where the PGA Tour pros are headed next. The Verizon Heritage Classic offers a different kind of challenge. To start, this Pete Dye designed course has the smallest greens on the tour (55% of norm). It is also the shortest course on the PGA Tour (a 6973-yard, Par 71). Plus, it is very narrow with most holes requiring precision driving accuracy.
John Farrell, Harbour Town’s Head Golf Pro, has been quoted saying that it is the course’s “target nature” that makes it play so difficult:
“You have to be real precise with your iron play to score well here, and you’d better be able to drive it to a certain part of the fairway to set up your next shot. It’s a real position golf course that favors accuracy over brawn, and that’s why so many tour players like it.”
Harbour Town is probably best known for the signature candy-cane striped lighthouse which can be seen on the approach to the 18th green. Interestingly enough, this lighthouse that was never actually used for seafaring vessels.
About this year’s field:
Some of the golfers playing this weekend include returning champion, Brian Gay, Paul Casey, K.J. Choi, John Daly, Luke Donald, Jim Furyk, Lucas Glover, Trevor Immelman, Zach Johnson, Matt Kuchar and Camilo Villegas.
Looks like CBS should raise a toast to Phil Mickelson and an “in the mix at the start of the fourth round” Tiger Woods for their roles in boosting television ratings 36% from last year’s win by Angel Cabrera in a two-hole playoff.
Sunday’s final round on CBS earned a 12.0 overnight rating and 25 share. The 2009 Masters was 8.8/21. The “off the charts” ratings of 15.8/32, occurred in 1997, when Tiger Woods won for the first time.
According to published reports, the 2010 Masters had the third highest overnight rating for a final round of any golf tournament since at least 1986, which is as far back as the records go.
So how did the 3-D broadcast do? Check out the thoughts of this columnist, Chris Zelkovich of the Toronto Star.
For a technical overview of the 3-D broadcast, check out what James Pikover had to say at Tom’s Guide.
“Once I settled in to watch, I decided that the Masters in 3D was surprisingly good. The picture was clean, and the extra depth afforded by 3D imagery helped me to see slopes and distances. I believe the 3D actually added to the golf-watching experience. As someone who’s been on the course but doesn’t play, the importance of understanding a distance or a slope can’t be emphasized enough. Those distances and angles get lost during regular broadcasts. 3D fills that gap very well.”
It was the eye of the tiger. I saw it on Sunday during the Masters broadcast. However, it wasn’t the tiger many expected. Rather, it was Phil Mickelson who hit a phenomenal second shot on No. 13 – off of pine needles, between two trees, over the creek, onto the green, four feet from the hole, sailing 207-yards.
Photo: David Cannon / Getty Images
He swung with determination and, I sensed, the confidence of a tiger going for a kill.
This report from Ron Kroichick of the San Francisco Chronicle describes what happened on that dogleg-left par-5 where Mickelson’s tee shot drifted into the trees on the right. The ball ended up a few feet behind one tree, with another close by.
“Remember, he led the Masters by two shots (after Choi made bogey ahead on the green) and mostly needed to avoid costly mistakes. His swing coach, Butch Harmon, hoped Mickelson would lay up short of the creek. His caddie, Mackay, vigorously asked him to lay up short of the creek.
Jack Nicklaus probably lays up short of the creek. So does Woods.
Arnold Palmer and his modern-day descendant? No way.
“I tried to talk him into laying it up and he said no,” caddie Jim “Bones” Mackay said. “Then we found out Choi had made 6, and I went at it again. He said, ‘Definitely no.’ He basically said, ‘Listen, there’s an opening in the trees and it’s a 6-iron into a big ole’ green. All I have to do is execute.’ Fair enough. I got out of the way, and you saw what he did.”
Said Mickelson of the opening in the trees: “The gap wasn’t huge, but it was big enough for a ball to fit through.”
So he brilliantly plopped he ball on the green, in what CBS analyst Nick Faldo called “the shot of his life.”
It doesn’t matter that he missed the short eagle putt and settled for birdie. What mattered was the conquering attitude he had when he hit that shot. You could see it and hear it.
At that point, I knew he had his third green jacket. The bogey-free 67 was extra icing on the cake.
Wasn’t that a great Masters? For me, the tournament just seems to get better and better each year. Coverage was solid, with CBS handling the live coverage like true pros, and The Golf Channel providing awesome analysis all through the week. My hat is well and truly tipped to both for superb coverage.
With that said, I came across the official 2010 Masters prize money list last night, and thought it was very must ‘post worthy’. Check it out for yourself after the jump.
Some interesting points to take from this:
The amounts remained unchanged from the 2009 event.
Any golfer missing the cut still received $10,000.
11 Masters Champions were at the event, but did not play. They received amounts totaling $110,000.
23 honorary invitees were present, with 17 of them being professional. These professionals received honoraria totaling $17,000. The remaining 6 were amateur, thus, they received no cash.
When I noticed the pin was tucked in its usual position on the 16th this Masters Sunday… I was hopeful for a bunch of aces (if struck to quite a large area, the green on 16 funnels down to the back-right pin). In fact, I was heard to mutter, ‘wouldn’t that be cool if either Lee or Phil drops a hole-in-one?’. That was my hope. Sadly, it didn’t happen, but Nathan Green DID ace the 16th on Sunday, followed by an encore performance from Ryan Moore.
I’ve included the videos below for your viewing pleasure. Enjoy!
Sure, Phil Mickelson’s second shot at 13 was probably one of the most amazing shots I’ve ever witnessed. He hit his tee shot through the fairway on the right, leaving him a 205 (or so) yard shot into the green for his second, from the pine straw, between two trees (not very much room). The ‘safe’ play would be to pitch the ball out into the fairway to a spot where a full wedge could be thrown at the green… But no, that’s not Phil’s style is it?
He gripped a 6-iron and let it rip. The ball flew clear through the trees, carried the creek by about 10 feet, and snuggled up to 3 feet from the cup. Brilliant. The fact that Mickelson missed the putt for eagle was surely disappointing, but Phil had still done what he needed to do. Birdie the par 5. One more par 5 was coming up at 15, and he would go on to birdie that one too.
Looking back at the shot, it was amazing… but things could have went horribly wrong. The pine straw is never easy to hit from. He could have hit it heavy and dumped the ball in the creek. The two trees he was attempting to hit between were awfully close. He could have banked the ball off one of the trunks, leaving him who knows where. The fact of the matter is, this could have been another ‘I’m so stupid’ moment for Phil… But he managed to pull this one off.
At the press conference afterward Phil was asked: ‘Phil, what’s the difference between a great shot and a good shot?’.. He answered: ‘A great shot is when you pull it off… A good shot is when you don’t have the guts to take it on…’